Skip to content

Setting achievable goals. It sounds smart. It's not.

Clive Griffiths
Clive Griffiths
1 min read

Setting achievable goals.

It sounds smart. It's not.
It feels productive. It's not.

In reality it’s a cop out.
In reality a way to feel good.

Like you’re making progress -
but without actually pushing yourself.

Ask yourself:
↳ Is it a sign you lack confidence?
↳ Is it a sign of your weak ambition?

Because here’s the truth:
↳ Achievable isn’t the same as effective.
↳ And easy? Easy is useless.

Elite performers don’t chase small -
they focus on winning

They set goals that stretch them, test them -
and demand more.

They don’t avoid discomfort.
They expect it. They embrace it.

You want real progress?
Stop looking for the easiest path.

Tackle the hard stuff:

⇥ Set a goal that actually scares you.
⇥ Get comfortable with being overwhelmed - it means you’re growing.
⇥ Stop designing goals around what feels manageable - aim higher.

Sure, define your small steps.
Breaking things down has its place.
But don’t start there - that’s planning.
And don’t confuse “easy to start” with “worth doing.”

Start with vision.
Then the plan to achieve it.
Critique the plan, not the vision.
And develop discipline to execute.

Game-changers don’t tiptoe in.
They grab the world, shake it, and take control.

So - are you playing it safe, or stepping up to the mark?

---
PS Does that 20% 'ambitious growth' is looking a bit sad now?

Look for a mentor who'll hold you accountable for driving through the hard stuff.

DM me Clive Griffiths

LinkedIn PostsLI-2025

Related Posts

Members Public

Think Different

I love it when there's a seemingly Unreasonable Agenda. The Apple Think Different campaign epitomised this. Just look at the change makers: Albert Einstein: Questioned absolute space-time. Bob Dylan: Reimagined song meanings poetically. Martin Luther King Jr.: Envisioned equality beyond segregation. Richard Branson: Ignored business conventions fearlessly. John

Members Public

Here to share

Posting regularly on LinkedIn one starts to appreciate the different social engagement circles. You've got your lurkers. They follow but never engage. You've got your collectors. They connect to boost their numbers, but aren't truly interested. You've got your barnacles (HT Dean

Members Public

Molly vs the Machines

Monetising misery. A machine for manipulating behaviour. Global architecture of surveillance. Computational governance. -//- Yesterday I watched Molly vs the Machines on Channel 4 catch up. I feel it's a must watch for anyone with children. The phrases above are four of many I wrote down, used